But, how does this all lead to accounting? Through life events and her years in Nepal, Ruff recognized how strong accounting information kept managers attuned to their financial bottom line, and an absence of strong social and environmental data relegated impact-focused actions to the backburner. It was at this time—an epiphany perhaps, that Ruff knew she wanted to be part of social policy change to keep social and environmental objectives part of the story.
To achieve this, Ruff got a master’s degree from the London School of Economics in Social Policy and Planning. Her research gave rise to a hugely influential and highly popular paper on the subject: The Next Frontier in Social Impact Measurement Isn’t Measurement at All (Stanford Social Innovation Review , 2016). But it wasn’t until two years later, while reading the Economist that part of a sentence: “…before there were income statements ,” that caught her attention, and another epiphany! “Maybe accounting hadn’t always been so straightforward; maybe there was more to learn about how standards emerged .” She found herself in the basement of the Harvard University library learning everything about the emergence and history of accounting.
From Nepal, to Harvard, to becoming an accountant; through this culmination of wisdom, Ruff discovered that, not only had no useful system worked to unify impact measurement standards since the invention of accounting, but she learned why—the missing puzzle piece—two puzzle pieces in fact. She learned that for a social impact measurement standard to be successful, it must have bounded flexibility , and it must involve the creation of an ecosystem . It works like this: to create data—numbers—that tell an important story about the value of social and environmental impact, the numbers need to be malleable to the principles and values that exist around the globe. It’s a bit of a “Goldilocks” scenario—for standards to be successful balance must be struck between loose standards that have no guided boundaries and rigid ones that thwart innovation.
The second piece to a successful social impact standard is creating an ecosystem. “It’s really about the group of enterprises who agree to stay aligned and stay in communication about the standards and how they will evolve over time. It’s about a community working together to keep that standard relevant—and this is so much more important than what ever gets put on a piece of paper .”
That brings us to today, where Ruff is exactly where she wants to be. And one may argue it was due to her passion and dedication to her mission in life, she is now spearheading one of the largest projects ever done in Canada to create a social impact measurement standard. Ten years to the day from that final epiphany, she was one of a select few invited by the Government of Canada to submit a proposal to create a social impact measurement standard. And she won. She is now creating a highly valuable flexible standard that can be managed across a broad band of Canadian social enterprises. It’s the first of its kind, and it’s major; it’s called: The Common Approach Project . Funded by the Employment and Social Development Canada, Ruff is working alongside an all-star team of partners including leading academics in Canada from various fields including, Information Technology, Impact Investing, along with charities, not-for-profits, and social enterprises.
The success of this project will ensure that socially- and environmentally-conscious consumers and investors have effective data that provide disclosure of, and one that will tell the true story of, firms’ social and environmental impact—and therefore help consumers make good and informed decisions on how to invest ethically and sustainably. This is Ruff’s life’s work; her mission.
Here’s to the most passionate and enthusiastic, humanitarian accountant, this world has seen!
Sprott School of Business